+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Results 61 to 63 of 63

Thread: A short Course in Marxism

  1. #61
    Top Poster

    Cael Dubh has a reputation beyond repute Cael Dubh has a reputation beyond repute Cael Dubh has a reputation beyond repute Cael Dubh has a reputation beyond repute Cael Dubh has a reputation beyond repute Cael Dubh has a reputation beyond repute Cael Dubh has a reputation beyond repute Cael Dubh has a reputation beyond repute Cael Dubh has a reputation beyond repute Cael Dubh has a reputation beyond repute Cael Dubh has a reputation beyond repute Cael Dubh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Aontas Sóvéideach na hÉireann
    Posts
    16,257
    Thanks
    643
    Thanked 1,720 Times in 795 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by The Patriot Game View Post
    Great thread.

    I have a few things to say about the first post though if it's ok.

    The things that you're objecting to are perfectly true if you accept the premises they're based on. What are those premises?

    Well...



    Here. If you accept Hegelian bullshit, then everything else in the post follows trivially.

    Hegel and Marx did not 'point' anything out, they conjectured. While a course on Marxism should, I guess, not delve too deeply into criticism of this (for fear of missing the point of the course), there needs to be a deeper discussion on Hegel before one can really communicate Marx.
    I don't disagree with you there, a chara. There is a general acceptance among philosophers today that you cant understand Marx without Hegel, and you cant understand Hegel without Marx. Your main objection seems to be with the term "shows," as in Hegel shows that the human subject is not ready made and unchanging. Of course he didnt "prove" that this is the case, but "show" and "prove" are not the same concept. If one puts forward a very tight argument, well backed up and resistant to contradiction, then its valid to say that you have "shown" something to be the case.

    I think if we look at the development of the child, it would be difficult to say that its subjectivity is not the result of its socialisation - rather than something that he\she was born with, and remains unchanging. Hegel's point was that as we aquire language, and develop our understanding of the world, our subjectivity expands. Freud "showed" that there is a kernal of subjectivity that is very resistant to change. This is a kernal of trauma centred around the castration complex. But this does not contradict Hegel, as the castration complex is a function of our socialisation.

    The soul is a similar idea to the subject - but not at all the same. The Christian idea is that the soul is given at conception, but Christianity does not accept that the soul is unchanging. It can, of course, be blackened by sin and ultimately condemned to eternal damnation. On the other hand, it may be enriched by meditation and love of God and man.
    Slavery and private land ownership are one and the same thing. The so called ending of slavery was just half of the job. The ending of private land ownership is the other half

    A person who is flabby and shaky on questions of theory — such a man is not a revolutionary, but a wretched amateur! V.I. Lenin

    Cael's Blog: http://irishsocialistrepublic.blogspot.com/

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Cael Dubh For This Useful Post:

    The Patriot Game (05-04-2010)

  3. #62
    Regular User CroppyBoy is a jewel in the rough CroppyBoy is a jewel in the rough CroppyBoy is a jewel in the rough CroppyBoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    220
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 63 Times in 44 Posts
    Im having a go at reading Marx's Capital at the moment and I came across this site. http://www.marxisteconomics.com/

    Might be usefull for anyone trying to read the book or anyone interested in Marx in general.

  4. #63
    Regular User
    DonegalDanny is on a distinguished road DonegalDanny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Belfast/Burnley
    Posts
    636
    Thanks
    148
    Thanked 279 Times in 162 Posts
    Very very interesting. Looking forward to reading more of these mini-essays. Definately made me think, cheers Cael.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ulster_Republican
    you cant take drugs you cant get too drunk you cant loose talk, being a republican is no craic at all is it

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
The owners of this forum are not responsible for views of members nor or we liable for any repercussions as a result of user's posts.